Showing posts with label Action Research. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Action Research. Show all posts

Tuesday, April 3, 2012

Rolling Along

Hi all,

A big thank you to everyone for your support over the past two years. Realizing that this blog keeps growing and that the options for making it navigable with blogger are diminishing week by week, I've moved over to WordPress.  I hope this doesn't cause any unnecessary inconvenience.

The original article you are looking for is below this short message. After reading, if you have a moment to check out the new (and hardly changed) "The Other Things Matter", please drop in.  Would love to hear from you.






I finally finished up my Action Research proposal today. Which also means I finished up the action research unit of my dip TESOL. I could write heaps about the experience. But I won't. Because I don't have any idea exactly what happened. Out of all the units so far, this was the one that, more often than not, just left me feeling kind of puzzled about what I was supposed to be doing. And that wasn't the fault of my trainer who was always there for me and answered a really inexcusable number of emails. But maybe after I collect my data and get everything into some kind of concrete form, I'll feel a little bit less nonplussed. If you are interested in my action research proposal, please feel free to have a read, although it's not too exciting.

Which is actually what this post was supposed to be about. Excitement. You see, I got to just about the end of my proposal and spent two days not finishing it. I would tinker with a paragraph here or find a new bit of research I wanted to cram in there, but mostly I spent the two days just wishing I would wake up and the action research proposal fairies would have written the last few paragraphs for me while I was asleep.

But this morning I woke up and had an email in my in box which was almost as good as a ARP-fairy. A friend had sent me a friend's paper on vocab cards. And this paper was so alive, the writer so believed in the importance of vocabulary cards in a language class, that the sense of conviction ran right through every single word on the page. I finished up the article on the train into work and realized that what was missing from my writing lately, both the words on the page and the feeling when I sat down at the computer, was that sense of conviction.

* * * 

This afternoon at school, we had a welcome party for the new first year students. Three of my International Course students came early to work as hosts. I hadn't seen them for a while, so when they walked through the door, I asked them, "How was your spring break?"
     Tosh looked at me with wide eyes and shook his head, like someone trying to get water out of their ears.
     I asked him again, "How was your spring break?"
     He shook his head and slowly repeated to himself, "Howasya spring break?"
Well, at least he caught spring break. But Ri-chan and Sari didn't do any better. So I handed them blank word cards and we did a little dictation. Once they got the phrase, "How was your…" written down on their cards, everything was fine and dandy and I learned that Tosh did nothing but sleep, Ri-chan very much enjoyed shopping, and Sari had to work at her part time job everyday. Two other International Course students came later and I gave them a word card each and told them to go and talk to Tosh and Ri-chan and Sari. By the end of the party, all the Interntional Course students had eaten too many chocolate chip cookies (not homemade, but very yummy in a chewy plastic kind of way), chatted up the first year students, and practiced the phrase "How was your…" to the point of near fluency.

After the students went home, I sat down on the computer and starting working on my action research proposal. I'm not sure if if I was writing with conviction, but that's OK. It's a research proposal.  If it was filled with strong convictions now, they would probably get in the way of finding out what I need to find out. But at least I wanted to write the paper. I didn't want to just finish it, like that one last thunk of a mallet that drives the stake through dracula's heart. I wanted to write it. To work on it. To help it take shape.

As English teachers we spend a lot of time talking about motivation. We search for the underlying factors that impact motivation, we draw links between motivation and autonomy. We argue about how to dilineate this motivation from that motivation. But how can we know what really motivates our students? Today I got an unexpected email, watched as a group of students made a piece of language their own, and ate as many chocolate chip cookies as I wanted. Today I finished writing my action research proposal. There was a feeling of excitement which carried over from event to event.  A certain easy rhythm developed over the course of the day.  Sometimes I think motivation is simply a form of emotional momentum.  If that's true, than one of the most important parts of our job as teachers is to help the students who are already on their way to just keep rolling along.

Tuesday, January 31, 2012

Action Research...too organic for me?

Hi all,

A big thank you to everyone for your support over the past two years. Realizing that this blog keeps growing and that the options for making it navigable with blogger are diminishing week by week, I've moved over to WordPress.  I hope this doesn't cause any unnecessary inconvenience.

The original article you are looking for is below this short message. After reading, if you have a moment to check out the new (and hardly changed) "The Other Things Matter", please drop in.  Would love to hear from you.






I’m working my way through the Dip TESOL course now.  The theory stuff on SLA, loved it.  Action research, not so much.  And it really is getting to me.  Why don’t I dig the action research?  Here’s my chance to evaluate what’s going on in my classes and for some reason I find myself shaking my head side to side much more than up and down.  I had to critique Nunan’s Action Research in the language classroom and giving it a careful read changed my mind somewhat.  But there is still this lingering unease.

Kemmis (2007) has said that, “Action research aims at changing three things: practitioners’ practices, their understandings of their practices, and the conditions in which they practice.”  So what could there be to disagree with.  I want to improve how I teach English, I want to have a deeper knowledge of how I see my teaching, and there is no doubt I would like to have a mechanism for changing the environment in which my teaching takes place.

I guess part of my problem with action research is the idea that I can spot a problem or am aware enough to pick out something useful in my teaching to focus on.  Sure, I understand it's subjective, that there’s no wrong thing to focus in on. If I or a co-worker identify an issue in my classroom, then I’m good to go.  I should tackle that problem with the same kind of focus I have when I read about and try to implement SLA research in my classroom.  But…but there is always the feeling of “but.”

I did what I usually do in these cases.  I read more.  I buried myself in Action Research for Language Teacher (Wallace, 1998).  Good book.  Didn’t help.  Kept getting hung up on lines like, "the process of professional development varies from one person to another," and "[Action research] nearly always arises from some specific problem or issue arising out of our professional practice."  Am I crazy or are there other people out there who feel that problems and issues that 'arise' might not actual be so much of a problem as the problems and issues that somehow stay hidden?
 
Then I read Head & Taylor’s (1997). Readings in teacher development.  Chock full of goodness.  Especially the stuff on 'Self and peer assessment.'  But did it leave me satisfied?  Nope.  So instead of reading, I decided to take Head & Taylor's advice and do a peer assessment.  They said watching another teacher was going to teach me loads about my own teaching.   

Luckily I have a game fellow teacher by the name of Scott.  We teach together on Fridays.  So I hit him up and he said no problem.  As suggested, I asked him what he was interested in getting feedback on.  Turns out that the issue arising from his professional practice is, "how to give classroom instructions."  Then I sat in the corner and took notes.  Lots and lots of notes.  Scott, like me, is a big kitchen timer kind of guy.  If you’re interested in my kitchen timer fetish, just check out my earlier post.  As I was watching him give instructions, very similar to my own style, I started to feel kind of itchy.  “OK,” he boomed out, “let’s practice for 3 minutes.  Go!”  or “OK, we are going to practice for 3 times.  1st time is 2 minutes.  Start!”  The look on the kids faces.  He said “start” and it was like the crack of a whip.  Is that what the kids looked like when I pushed the button on the kitchen timer?  Not good.

During our feedback session, I asked Scott, “How do you come up with the times you set for your activities.”  He didn’t know.  He looked a little depressed.  I told him I only asked because I also didn’t have any real basis for the times I set either.  We both kind of agreed that maybe it might be better to just ask the students, “How long do you think you need to practice this language to get a little more comfortable?” or see how many times the students wanted to practice. 

That’s what I’ve been doing in my classes since Friday.  With a little tweak.  First I give the students a ridiculously short amount of time to practice.  Maybe only a minute.  Just so they can see how far they can get.  It's their baseline.  Then I ask them, “OK, how much time do you really need to practice this conversation from start to finish one time.”  The student suggestions are, in and of themselves, awesomely random.  Students yell out, “10 minutes,” “3 minutes,” “5 minutes.”  But they YELL out a time.  They are yelling to practice English.  Same goes for number of times to practice.  In my morning class today the kids built a dialogue on hobbies. One kid said he wanted to practice it 35 times.  We would have been in class until 7 PM.  Luckily the other students had a bit more confidence and negotiated him down to 7 times.

Identifying an issue, careful observation, and just a little bit of feedback has already made my class more student centered and probably more productive as well.  And I wasn't even the one being assessed.  Still, I can't shake my doubts about how I should go about implementing action research for myself.  I long for some kind of truly objective tool to help me identify what to focus on.  That being said, probably my biggest issue with action research is just...me.  I want to learn something before I do it.  I want to break everything apart and put it back together mentally before I'm willing to try it out on the road.  But reading text after text isn’t going to carry me any closer to a place where I’m comfortable with action research.  Just like arbitrarily setting a 3 minute time limit on practice isn’t necessarily going to get my students any more comfortable with a particular aspect of English.  However long it takes, it takes.  However many times I need to try it, I need to try it.  To find out the value of action research, I'm going to have to put it into practice and watch as it unfolds inside and in-front of me. 


Head, K. & Taylor, P. (1997). Readings in teacher development. Oxford: Heinemann.

Kemmis, S. (2007), "Action Research As a Practice-Changing Practice." Opening Address for the Spanish Collaborative Action Research Network Conference, University of Valladolid. Retrieved 17 January, 2011 from http://www.infor.uva.es/~amartine/MASUP/Kemmis_2007.pdf
Nunan, D. (1990). "Action research in the language classroom." In J. Richards & D. Nunan (Eds.). Second Language Teacher Education (pp.62-81).  Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Wallace, M.J. (1998), Action Research for Language Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.