Tuesday, May 15, 2012

Teaching the value of what you teach

Hi all,

A big thank you to everyone for your support over the past two years. Realizing that this blog keeps growing and that the options for making it navigable with blogger are diminishing week by week, I've moved over to WordPress.  I hope this doesn't cause any unnecessary inconvenience.

The original article you are looking for is below this short message. After reading, if you have a moment to check out the new (and hardly changed) "The Other Things Matter", please drop in.  Would love to hear from you.





The latest iTDi blog has me thinking about “difficult students.”  Actually, it seems like all the ELT twitter world is thinking about “difficult students”.  I’m not a big fan a labels.  Once I start thinking of a student as “difficult” it gets kind of Hawthornian, doesn’t it?  The student suddenly has a big red “D” emblazoned on their school uniform from then on out.  On the other hand, there’s no denying that certain students exhibit behaviors which seem predicated on their ability to make me want to do a crazy dance and scream at the top of my lungs. 

The other day I wrote up a little post about a student who clearly couldn’t read English.  Once I identified the first student, it dawned on me that perhaps the reason for another student’s lack of participation in class was a similar reading issue.  Let’s call him T-Kun.  T-Kun never takes out his book when the bell rings.  Never writes notes in class.  And seems to view his desk as some alternative form of futon.  But if he couldn’t read, it would certainly explain a lot.  If I had a choice between looking at a bunch of squiggles on a page for an hour or taking a nap, I certainly know which one I would chose.  So I asked him if he could read, and he answered cheerfully enough, “Nope!”  So he joined our remedial reading group.  And he dragged along a friend who he said can’t read as well.  So in the case of T-Kun, “difficult” could be seen from two points of view.  Difficult could describe his behaviors, but it could also describe the class expectations which have been set for him as well.  During our remedial reading lessons (3 so far), T-Kun has been a model student.  He points at each letter as I read.  He tries to sound out words.  He smiles and participates.  When sentences or phrases are repeated in the text, he happily identifies where they appeared previously in the text.  It’s not that it’s all easy for him.  It took him almost a full minute to sound out the sentence, “Come here and look at this.”  But the content is appropriate, there is a chance of meeting my expectations, and he can succeed. 

Now I’m not saying that all students act out because they can’t do the work.  In fact, just before our third reading lesson, a bunch of the upper-class students were lounging around outside the classroom door.  Among the gang was one student, let’s call him Mr. Y, who, I sheepishly admit, I branded “D” during the last school year.  He spent a year abroad and he has an easy way with phrases which sometimes surprises me.  The other day in class, he was talking up a storm during a silent reading exercise and when I asked him to get back on task he smiled and said, “You got it, captain.”  I know that his lack of focus is just the opposite of T-Kun.  The class content is just too easy to be engaging.  So when I get the chance, I’ll find a way to make the task more difficult.  During dictation exercises, I’ll ask him to add an adjective to each sentence I say, or during a reading exercises, I’ll have him do a written summary of each paragraph as he reads.  But I don’t always remember him and his needs during every class.  And even if I did, I often think there must be a better way to keep him engaged.

Anyway, Mr. Y was chilling out in front of the classroom door and he said, “What are you doing?”  So I told him that there were some first year students who were having trouble with their reading and asked him if he wanted to help.  To which he said, “You bet.”  And help he did.  He sat down at the table with us as I slowly sounded out words for the students.  And then just to see what would happen, I asked him to teach the next page.  He said to the three first year students, “I’m going to read and stop suddenly.  I want you to follow along with your finger.  When I stop, you stop.”  And he read the sentences, “Come here and look at this.  Is it a dinosaur?”  Only he suddenly stopped while pronouncing the ‘h’ of here.  And then he checked to make sure the three students fingers were stopped on that ‘h’.  He repeatedly said the sentences, stopping at different points in the sentences.  The first year students had a great time.  I learned a new teaching trick.  And the “D” on Mr. Y’s chest faded away.  And he said he would be volunteering to help out again next Tuesday.

So here’s my hope.  Mr. Y now has a reason to engage with texts which are below his level.  While he’s doing the in-class readings, maybe he will think about the ways he could teach the text to the first year students.  And that will help keep him interested in what’s going on in classes which, up until yesterday, might have been slightly level inappropriate.  Because if a student just can’t see how what their learning is useful, talking up a storm with a friend certainly might seem like a better use of their time than participant in class.  But finding that sense of worth can be pretty hard.  I was lucky that Mr. Y volunteered to help out yesterday and doubly lucky that he seems to have a real knack for teaching.  Still, when a student is making me want to do the crazy dance next time, I think I’ll take a moment and ask myself, “Can I honestly say that this student understand the value of this activity?”  Because if a student can’t see the value of the path we’re walking on, it’s always going to be more interesting to wander off into the forest of “difficult” behavior.

Friday, May 11, 2012

It's not teaching, if you're not noticing

Hi all,

A big thank you to everyone for your support over the past two years. Realizing that this blog keeps growing and that the options for making it navigable with blogger are diminishing week by week, I've moved over to WordPress.  I hope this doesn't cause any unnecessary inconvenience.

The original article you are looking for is below this short message. After reading, if you have a moment to check out the new (and hardly changed) "The Other Things Matter", please drop in.  Would love to hear from you.





This year I get to teach 6 hours a week of a structural syllabus linked up to a series of short texts about Earth Day, sugarcane growing in Okinawa, and the Alabama bus boycott.  Each of the short texts helps (?) highlight a key grammar point while also working hard to confuse or bore even the most dedicated student.  Now I don’t want to just spend an entire post complaining about course materials.  A recent blog post on reflecting vs. complaining from Michael Griffin has me wanting to jump from complaining into something a little more productive.  But please, someone tell me how ‘environmental’, ‘many other things’, ‘overpopulation’, ‘serious’, ‘hunger’, and ‘get together’ got selected as key vocabulary to teach a remedial 1st year high school English class for students who, for the most part, did not attend junior high school. 


Still, I’m trying to see the whole experience as a way to stretch myself as a teacher.  I mean, how often will I get the chance to teach present simple tense, the interrogative form, and negative sentence construction all within a fifty minutes lesson?  I even spent an hour the other day teaching a series of grammar points to an empty classroom because my use of whiteboard space had the logical flow of a maze from a mouse and cheese experiment.  In a way, I even had kind of a good time plowing through three discreet grammar points as my voice echoed off the walls. 


Fortunatley, grammar only makes up 50% of the unit tests.  The other 50% is basically students' ability to reproduce the text.  So if students get familiar enough with the texts, they have a pretty good chance of passing the test.  I try and have the students work with the text at least 4 or 5 times during the first 10 minutes of each lesson.  At least one of the activities is based around ‘depth of processing hypothesis’ or the idea that mental activities which require more processing will help in retention (Craik and Lockhart 1972). During the first lessons, I had students turn their books upside down as they read aloud and directed students to mark off sense groups as I read the text to them.  I’ve even had the students read the text out loud and verbally stress all the nouns or verbs and this activity seemed to hit the sweet spot where the students wrinkle-up their foreheads in thought but rarely shook their heads in frustration.  But once I asked all of the students to read the text and replace all sentences using “be” verbs with the yes/no interrogative form.  This basically resulted in a whole lot of silence.  So it’s kind of hit or miss right now between activities which require more processing and those that result in an insufficient memory error.


The other activities I run are based on the Baddeley’s ‘retrieval practice effect’ or the fact that, “the very act of recalling something facilitates its subsequent recall,” as long as the item is in fact successfully recalled (Ellis, 1995).  So the activities need to require some effort at recall, but failure means just a bunch of wasted time.  Some relatively successful activities included laying a strip of thin paper over each student's book and having them read the text, cloze tests, and C-tests (in which letters of words, as opposed to entire words, are removed from the text).  




At last count, my students have read the text about Earth Day a total of 17 times in class and even the handful of upper level students still seem pretty engaged.  But I was starting to run out of ideas for opening activities.  Luckily, Rachel Roberts, on her blog elt-resourceful has had a series of posts on reading that are just chock full of good ideas.  So the other day I spent the first five minutes of class trying out the read-for-one-minute-and-see-how-far-you-get-activity.  I pulled out my handy kitchen timer, set it for a minute, and had the students just read the text.  At the end of a minute, I said stop and had students circle the last word they had read.  Then we repeated the whole process again. And while students were silently reading, I watched.  I watched as their eyes slid down the page, watched as they flipped pages, watched as some of their mouths moved as they read.  And I noticed one student who was doing none of these things.  She had her hands folded flat on the table in front of her and her eyes remained fixed and opened to the point where they seemed to be almost tearing up.  


During lunch, I found the girl, A-Chan, and said (in Japanese), “Class was pretty difficult today, huh?”  And she nodded.  And then I took a deep breath and I said, “So, you can’t read English?” And she nodded slowly.  And I said, “Do you want to learn how to read English with me?  We can study after school starting next week.”  And she smiled.  She smiled and nodded yes.  So we set up a study schedule and I’m going to be doing some one-on-one reading tutoring for the next few weeks.


But I have to admit that saying, “You don’t know how to read,” was one of the hardest things I’ve done as a teacher lately.  I worried about how she was going to react, how upset she might be if I had made a mistake.  And I would be lying if I said I didn’t also think about the responsibility it would entail if she said yes.  But I’m starting to realize that this is what being a teacher is all about, just recognizing where you are needed and finding a way to be there.


For the past three weeks, I’ve spent the first ten minutes of my first year English classes focused almost entirely on how to ensure that the students will pass the first unit test.  I’ve been hopping from activity to activity and kind of forgot, that for some students, passing that test couldn’t be less important.  So a big thank you to Rachel for an activity which gave me the time to watch my class, notice what was going on, and realize where I needed to be.  And a thank you to you too A-chan.  For meeting my question, not with shame, but with a smile.  Now let’s do some reading.    


References:
 
Craik, F. I. M. and Lockhart, R.S. (1972) ‘Levels of processing: a framework for memory research’. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 11: 67--84.

Ellis, N.C (1995) The Psychology of Foreign Language Vocabulary Acquisition:
Implications for CALL. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 8: 103-28


Thursday, May 10, 2012

Teaching the Hell out of the Present Simple Tense (a link only)

Hi all,

A big thank you to everyone for your support over the past two years. Realizing that this blog keeps growing and that the options for making it navigable with blogger are diminishing week by week, I've moved over to WordPress.  I hope this doesn't cause any unnecessary inconvenience.

The original article you are looking for is below this short message. After reading, if you have a moment to check out the new (and hardly changed) "The Other Things Matter", please drop in.  Would love to hear from you.





So the past week or so I have been crazy busy getting ready for a conference presentation on informal writing within a TBL framework and writing a language awareness paper for my dip TESOL.  I tweeted a few days ago that I was going to post my language awareness paper here on my blog, but after reading it over again, I just can't imagine that anyone, except someone absolutely enthralled with the present simple tense, would find anything of interest in these 1900 words over-production.  So instead, I am linking to the paper here just in case anyone really, really wants to read it.

Language Awareness Unit, Task 3: Teaching the Hell out of the Simple Present Tense

Sometime later today (or this weekend), I do have a new post itching to be written about some reading exercises I ran in a class the other day.  Because in the middle of all this crazy, I really am still teaching classes.  And thank god for that.

Tuesday, May 1, 2012

Remembering What You Already Know

Hi all,

A big thank you to everyone for your support over the past two years. Realizing that this blog keeps growing and that the options for making it navigable with blogger are diminishing week by week, I've moved over to WordPress.  I hope this doesn't cause any unnecessary inconvenience.

The original article you are looking for is below this short message. After reading, if you have a moment to check out the new (and hardly changed) "The Other Things Matter", please drop in.  Would love to hear from you.






I've got five more days to whip a structural syllabus (for which the word structural is a terrible misnomer) into something I and the other teachers in my school can actually teach.  I have 17 days to get my presentation on informal writing in a TBL structure ready for my first TBLT conference presentation.  It's 11:00 PM at night and I am working on 11 hours of sleep for the past 2 days.  And I'm gonna blog.  No time limits.  No goals.  Just a story about how my week went and what I think I might be able to do about it.

On Monday I was working with the new International Course students.  We were doing a very short reading (~200 words) about a truck driver named Raj from Singapore.  I was using a technique I had learned from John Fanselow, a kind of pictographic dictation exercise (a dicto-pict?  A picto-dic?).  Students were instructed to listen to a story and replace each word in the story with one image.  The exercise went pretty well.  Once students had finished the pictograph--which only took about five minutes--they then used their picto-dictation to re-tell the story to their partner.  Unfortunately, all the function words seemed to vanish.  "Raj loves to drive his big truck," was transformed into, "Raj loves drive big truck."  And perhaps even more disturbing, all traces of tense fell out of the narrative.  "Raj drove his truck yesterday," became, "Raj drive his truck yesterday." 

So I did what most normal teachers would do.  I threw my arms in the air and sent an e-mail to the guy who taught me the activity.  And John was good enough to send me an email back, asking me to just take a minute to reread the principles of our program.  So I did.  And that's when I noticed this sentence in the middle of the first paragraph, "It is our job to help students realize how much they already know about language."  I sent John an email back thanking him for his time and worked to put together a lesson which would meet the minimum standards of my job as laid out in the above bolded and italicized sentence.

In the next lesson, I also did a short, 200 word story about a crazy student named Sally who had a seriously deranged anxiety dream (she stopped a truck with her head, if you're interested).  As usual, I started the class by reading the story and asking the students to write down what percent they had understood.  The average ended up coming in at about 68%.  In my experience, 68% usually means that most of the students are feeling pretty frustrated and wondering why I don't hand out key vocabulary words like the other teachers in school. 

Before I read the story a second time, I gave the students a worksheet in which every word in the story had been replaced by a dot.  Each line of the page looked something like this (if the spacing get's all internet crazy, just imagine a straight line of dots, please):

・ ・ ・ ・ ・ ・ ・ ・ ・ ・ ・ ・ ・

I asked the students to draw a slash between sense groups, which they would be able to recognize by a short pause in the flow of my speech.  The students had done a number of sense group activities in their first year classes and they had very little trouble with this activity.  Now that they had the story broken down into sense groups, I asked them to listen one more time, only this time I wanted them to write the first letter of the first word above the first dot in each sense group.  That ended up producing something like the following (sorry if there's any crazy internet spacing issues here):

         M                          W                           S            
        ・ ・ ・ ・  / ・ ・ ・ ・ / ・ ・ ・ ・ /

I repeated the process two more times, asking students to write the first letter of each verb in each sense group and then the first letter of each noun above each sense group.  By the third reading, students had produced something like the following:



         M  T                       W   S    G               S   W         
        ・ ・ ・ ・  / ・ ・ ・ ・ / ・ ・ ・ ・ /

I then gave the students five minutes to form groups and reconstitute the story in it's entirety.  Basically I had run a variation on a staged dictogloss activity.  After the students had reconstituted the story, I asked them again to write down what percentage of the story they had understood.  The average had now jumped to just under 100%.  The students had been reminded of how much they new about language.  They knew what a sense group was.  They knew how to identify parts of speech.  They knew how to listen for specific sounds and information.  They knew how to put together parts of speech into well formed sentences.  So as a final exercise, I asked the students to try the picto-dictation exercise again.  And this time, during the retelling of the story, words were marked for tense and the magically vanishing function words managed to remain right were they needed to be within each sentence.  

I recently wrote my first guest blog post for Barbara Sakamoto's "Teaching Village."  I wrote about using short stories within the language classroom.  I also revised the post for an ELT journal.  I was pretty surprised to find out that my idea of skipping any meaning based exercises when first working with a text was controversial.  I've been avoiding comprehension exercises for so long, I've forgotten that they are a regular part of many classrooms.  The reason I stopped using them was pretty simple.  If you ask a student, "Who is Bob?" and the students says, "He is the character Timothy's father," what does that actually do in the way of language development?  And if a learner doesn't know who Bob is, does telling the student the answer (or having another student give the correct answer) do anything in the way of language development?  I just couldn't see any positive outcome when it came to comprehension checks.  But I found that if I had the students work with the language in the story from a few different angles, the meaning of the story would emerge.  But something doesn't emerge from nothing.  And that's what I had forgotten during my Monday classes, when I suddenly asked my students to interact with a text through a 100% novel activity.  Not only were they struggling to understanding the meaning of the text, they were also trying to understand the meaning of the activity.  Activities are not an obstacle course.  At their best, they are a way to reveal to students what they already know about language.

I have 5 more days to take an antiquated structural syllabus and turn it into a series of teachable lessons.  I've got 17 days to polish up my first TBLT presentation.  But tomorrow and tomorrow and the tomorrow after that I have to go into class and help students remember how much they already know about language.  Writing this blog is one of the ways I can do that, by remembering the things I sometimes forget about teaching.  Like the fact that teaching isn't about providing answers, but about asking questions.  That once the class bell rings, external deadlines have nothing to do with my students.  And that reflective practices aren't reflective if I only do them when I feel like I have the luxury of time.